Saying Goodbye to Form 1004: Ordering and Identifying Appraisals Without Form Numbers
The UAD 3.6 eliminates form numbers, using property characteristics to define report structure for a more flexible, data-driven appraisal process.
The UAD 3.6 eliminates form numbers, using property characteristics to define report structure for a more flexible, data-driven appraisal process.
Hey fellow appraisers,
Let's talk about something baked into our muscle memory: form numbers. For years, the 1004, 1073, 2055... they haven't just been numbers; they've been shorthand for the entire scope of an assignment. When an order came in for a "1004," we instantly knew the property type, the general requirements, the expected report structure. It was familiar, maybe even comfortable.
Well, as we all know, big changes are rolling in with the UAD 3.6 and Forms Redesign initiative from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And one of the most fundamental shifts? Those familiar form numbers are going away for GSE appraisals.
I know, I know. It sounds a bit jarring at first. How will assignments be ordered? How will we know what kind of report to produce? How will reviewers understand what they're looking at without that familiar number at the top?
I've been digging into the GSE resources, particularly the "Functioning without Form Numbers" guide and the example URARs (like the SF1 Single Family Scenario in Appendix D-1), and I wanted to share what I've learned from one appraiser to another. The good news is, it’s actually pretty logical once you understand the new mechanism.
Why the Change? Beyond Just Numbers
First, let's quickly touch on the 'why'. The old system, while familiar, had limitations. The static nature of the forms meant they didn't always handle atypical properties well (think site condos, multi-unit properties with ADUs, etc.). We often found ourselves relying heavily on addenda to explain unique situations.
The UAD 3.6 initiative aims for a more standardized, data-driven approach. The goal is a single, dynamic Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR) that adapts to the property being appraised, rather than trying to fit every property into a pre-defined box. This requires a new way of defining the "type" of report.
The "How": Property Characteristics Drive the Report
Instead of relying on a form number, the new URAR uses specific data points collected about the subject property to define the scope and structure of the report. Think of it this way: the data itself tells the system (and the reader) what kind of appraisal this is.
Where does this happen? Primarily in the Summary Section of the new URAR. Based on the GSE documentation, there are six key data points that work together:
Putting it Together: Examples
How these pieces combine determines the "report type":
You get the idea. The combination of these key characteristics, entered accurately, dictates the relevant sections and data points that appear in the final URAR.
What This Means for Our Workflow
The Bottom Line
The transition away from form numbers is a significant change, but it's part of a necessary evolution towards a more modern, flexible, and data-centric appraisal process. It's driven by the characteristics of the property itself, which, when you think about it, makes a lot of sense.
It will take some getting used to, no doubt. But understanding how these key data points now define the report is the first crucial step. I strongly recommend checking out the "Functioning without Form Numbers" document and the sample URAR reports on the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac UAD pages.
Let's keep learning and adapting together. This is a big shift, but focusing on accurate data and understanding the new structure will help us navigate it smoothly.
Stay sharp out there,
John Anderson